A STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF WEBSITE DESIGN IN THE B2B MARKET USING STOCHASTIC METHODS IN THE FIELD OF INNOVATION MARKETING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35433/ISSN2410-3748-2026-1(38)-6

Keywords:

innovation marketing, probability theory, websites and web design, startup, industrial market, B2B market, data analysis, R programming language, mathematical methods, stochastic methods

Abstract

In the context of the digital transformation of the B2B market, the online presence of an innovative company or startup is a key factor in business success and a critical instrument for risk mitigation among stakeholders. However, the design of corporate websites often relies on subjective preferences, creating an urgent scientific need to develop mathematically rigorous tools capable of accounting for high levels of market uncertainty. The aim of this paper is to develop a comprehensive methodology for assessing the impact of a website’s architecture and web design on the market success and investment attractiveness of innovative companies and startups in the industrial market.

The proposed methodology is based on the systematic integration of deterministic and stochastic approaches. In the first stage, T. L. Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied to mathematically formalize subjective expert assessments of web design parameters within the RStudio software environment. In the second stage, the obtained global weights are transformed into random variables using Monte Carlo simulation to account for high market uncertainty. The final stage involves constructing a multiple linear regression model to assess the degree of influence of specific digital interaction criteria on the commercial success of an innovative company or startup.

The scientific novelty lies in the proposal of a hybrid approach for B2B innovation marketing tasks, which transforms the deterministic qualitative parameters of the web interface into stochastic variables. The study scientifically substantiates the concept wherein the static weights derived from the AHP are utilized as the expected values of stochastic variables in a Monte Carlo simulation model, and simultaneously act as integral predictors in a multiple linear regression equation.

As a result of the study, a three-level hierarchical structure of determinants of digital interaction was formed (3 criteria, 9 sub-criteria, and 2 alternatives). Based on the results of processing expert matrices in RStudio, the dominant influence of the ‘Trust and Credibility’ criterion (41.0 %) was demonstrated compared to ‘Value Rationalization’ (29.9 %) and ‘User Experience (UX) and Conversion Architecture’ (29.1 %). The key sub-criterion identified is ‘Case Studies Depth’ (19.2 %). A mathematical framework has been developed for subsequent stochastic validation of the model.

In terms of practical value, the resulting system of weighting coefficients and the logic of stochastic modeling provide a basis for the quantitative comparative assessment of alternatives regarding whether a company’s web resource is a ‘High Impact B2B Site’ or a ‘Low Impact B2B Site’. The implementation of the research results will allow innovative companies and startups in the B2B market to optimize marketing budgets and increase the likelihood of attracting investment through scientifically grounded web resource design.

References

Priya, P., & Venkatesh, A. (2012). Integration of Analytic Hierarchy Process with Regression Analysis to Identify Attractive Locations for Market Expansion. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 19(3–4), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1471

Lee, Y., & Kozar, K. A. (2006). Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1383–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.11.005

Morales-Vargas, A., Pedraza-Jimenez, R., & Codina, L. (2023). Website quality evaluation: A model for developing comprehensive assessment instruments based on key quality factors. Journal of Documentation, 79(7), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2022-0246

Akman, G., Boyacı, A. İ., & Kurnaz, S. (2022). Selecting the suitable E-commerce marketplace with neutrosophic fuzzy AHP and EDAS methods from seller’s perspective in the context of COVID-19. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v14i3.994

Chen, Y., Tsai, C., & Liu, H. (2019). Applying the AHP model to explore key success factors for high-tech startups entering international markets. International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), 11(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEA.2019010104

Timóteo, T. R., Cazeri, G. T., Moraes, G. H. S. M. d., Sigahi, T. F. A. C., Zanon, L. G., Rampasso, I. S. & Anholon, R. (2024). Use of AHP and grey fixed weight clustering to assess the maturity level of strategic communication management in Brazilian startups. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 14(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-06-2023-0052

Kyrylych, T. & Povstenko, Y. (2023). Multi-Criteria analysis of startup investment alternatives using the hierarchy method. Entropy, 25(5), 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25050723

Lee, B, Kim, B, & Ivan, U. V. (2024). Enhancing the competitiveness of AI technology-based startups in the digital era. Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010006

Kofanov, O. Ye., Zozulov, O. V., Solntsev, S. O., & Bazherina, K. V. (2023). Dynamic decision-making framework for evaluating the market potential and success of innovative startups on the basis of a marketing research approach using R. Academic Review, 2(59), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2023-2-59-14

Kofanov, O., Kofanova, O., Tkachuk, K., Tverda, O., & Shostak, I. (2024). Enhancement of the market attractiveness and success of startups on the circular economy and sustainability principles. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2(10), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2024.10.02.07

Saaty, T. L. & Vargas, L. G. (2013). Decision making with the analytic network process. Economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. New York, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7

Gu, W., Saaty, T.L., & Wei, L. (2018). Evaluating and optimizing technological innovation efficiency of industrial enterprises based on both data and judgments. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 17(1), 9–43. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622017500390

Posit (2025). RSTUDIO IDE. Available at: https://posit.co/products/open-source/rstudio

The Comprehensive R Archive Network (2016). Analytic Hierarchy Process ahp Available at: https://cran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2016-08-05/web/packages/ahp/index.html

The Comprehensive R Archive Network (2025). Download and Install R. Available at: https://www.stats.bris.ac.uk/R/

Managing a global workforce shouldn’t be this hard (2026). DEEL. Available at: https://www.deel.com/inbound-general

Time is money. Save both (2026). Ramp. Available at: https://ramp.com

The Collaborative Interface Design Tool (2026). Figma. Available at: https://www.figma.com/

Software to replace all software (2026). ClickUp. Available at: https://clickup.com/

Published

2026-05-26